Monday, 16 August 2010

St Stephen of Hungary

August 16

On the day of 16 August

Of Saint Stephen, king of the Hungarians, who, reborn in baptism, received the crown of the kingdom from Pope Silvester II, attended to the spread of faith in Christ among the Hungarians, established the Church in his kingdom and provided for the poor and for monasteries until his soul migrated to heaven from Alba Regalis* on the day of the Assumption.

*Royal White Castle, present day Székesfehérvár.


 
 

Stephen I of Hungary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Saint Stephen I
Apostolic King of Hungary
King of Hungary
Reign 1001 – 1038
Coronation 25 Dec. 1000/ 1 Jan. 1001
Predecessor Himself as Grand Prince
Successor Peter I
Grand Prince of the Hungarians
Reign c. 997 – 1000
Predecessor Géza
Successor Himself as King of Hungary
Spouse Giselle of Bavaria
Issue
Saint Emeric
House House of Arpad
Father Géza of Hungary
Mother Sarolt of Transylvania
Born  ? 967 - 975
Esztergom, Principality of Hungary
Died 15 August 1038 (aged 62-71)
Esztergom or Székesfehérvár, Hungary
Burial Székesfehérvár, Hungary
Signature
Saint Stephen I (Hungarian: I. (Szent) István) (Latin: Sanctus Stephanus) (Esztergom, 967/969/975 – 15 August 1038, Esztergom-Szentkirály[1][2][3] or Székesfehérvár, Hungary), born Vajk, was Grand Prince of the Hungarians (997–1000) and the first King of Hungary (1000–1038). He greatly expanded Hungarian control over the Carpathian Basin during his lifetime, broadly established Christianity in the region, and is generally considered to be the founder of the Kingdom of Hungary. Pope Gregory VII canonized Stephen I, together with his son, Saint Emeric of Hungary and Bishop Gerard of Csanád, on 20 August 1083. Stephen became one of the most popular saints in Hungary, and his birthday is celebrated as a state holiday commemorating the foundation of the nation.

Contents

[hide]

[edit] Early years

Saint Stephen I in Budapest
He was born as "Vajk"[4][5] in the town of Esztergom[4]. His father was Grand Prince Géza of Hungary[4]; his mother was Sarolt[6], daughter of Gyula of Transylvania [7] a Hungarian nobleman who had been baptized in Greece [8]. Though Sarolt was baptized into the Orthodox Christian faith at her father's court in Transylvania [9] by the Greek bishop Hierotheos,[6][10] she did not persist in the religion[11]. According to his legends, Vajk was baptized a Christian by Saint Adalbert of Prague.[12][13] He was given the baptismal name Stephen (István) in honour of the original early Christian Saint Stephen.[14] The baptised name was possibly chosen on purpose, as it means not only "crown" as mentioned, but also "norm, standard" in Hebrew.[15] So the mission of St. Stephen was to grant a norm to Hungary through the Holy Crown (also called the Doctrine of the Holy Crown). However, another reason could be thought of: that Stephen, as fiancé of a woman from the diocese of Passau, simply wanted to do honour to the then-major saint of Passau, Saint Stephen, after whom the Passau Cathedral is named up to today.
When Stephen reached adolescence, Great Prince Géza convened an assembly where they decided that Stephen would follow his father as the monarch of the Hungarians.[16] This decision, however, contradicted the Magyar tribal custom that gave the right of succession to the eldest close relative of the deceased ruler.
Stephen married Giselle of Bavaria[4], the daughter of Henry II the Wrangler[4] in or after 995.[17] By this marriage, he became the brother-in-law of the future Henry II, Holy Roman Emperor. Giselle arrived at her husband's court accompanied by German knights.[18]

[edit] Ruling prince of the Hungarians

In 997, his father died and a succession struggle ensued.[16] Stephen claimed to rule the Magyars by the principle of Christian divine right, while his uncle Koppány, a powerful pagan chieftain in Somogy, claimed the traditional right of agnatic seniority.[18] Eventually, the two met in battle near Veszprém and Stephen, victorious, assumed the role of Grand Prince of the Hungarians. Stephen's victory came about primarily thanks to his German retinue led by the brothers Pázmány and Hont[19]. The nearly contemporary deed of foundation of the Abbey of Pannonhalma clearly described the battle as a struggle between the Germans and the Magyars. Thus, Stephen strengthened his power in Transdanubia, but several parts of Hungary still did not accept his rule.
Statue of King Stephen I of Hungary and Queen Giselle in Veszprém (Hungary)
According to Hungarian tradition, Pope Silvester II, with the consent of Otto III, Holy Roman Emperor, sent a magnificent jeweled gold crown to Stephen along with an apostolic cross and a letter of blessing officially recognizing Stephen as the Christian king of Hungary. Later this tradition was interpreted as the papal recognition of the independence of Hungary from the Holy Roman Empire. The date of Stephen's coronation is variously given as Christmas Day, 1000 or 1 January 1001.
Stephen I is closely tied to the Crown of St. Stephen and the Doctrine of the Holy Crown which marks a unique tradition of the Kingdom of Hungary. According to Hartwick's legend, during his coronation Stephen dedicated the crown to the Holy Virgin, thereby sealing a contract between God and the crown (which is therefore considered a "holy" crown). This contract is also the basis for the Doctrine of the Holy Crown and the basis for the Apostolic Kingdom of Hungary. The actual crown which survives today was probably never worn by the king himself as it has been dated as originating in the 12th century. The origin of the crown, however, is hotly disputed.

[edit] First King of Hungary

King Stephen's statue in his hometown, Esztergom
According to the much argued Chronicon Pictum, the first king of the Hungarians is Attila the Hun. However, the codex repeats itself as Stephen I is also cited as the first king of the Hungarians. Also argued by historians is the exact meaning of the phrase in the Remonstrances to Emerick from St Stephen: "Regale ornamentum scito esse maximum: sequi antecessores reges et honestos imitari parentos", which translates to: "The greatest deed for the kingdom is to follow the old kings and to imitate parents". This might mean that Stephen is referring to the "old kings" which could only be Attila and Nimrod. It might also mean that the constitution of the kingdom itself was not employed by St Stephen, but by his ancestors.
What is confirmed is that, after (or just before) his coronation, Stephen I founded several dioceses, namely, the dioceses of Veszprém, Győr, Kalocsa, Vác, and Bihar. He also established the Archdiocese of Esztergom. Thus he set up an ecclesiastical organisation independent of the German archbishops. He also began to organize a territory-based administration by founding several counties (comitatus, megye) in his kingdom.
Stephen discouraged pagan customs and strengthened Christianity by means of various laws. In his first decree, issued at the beginning of his rule, he ordered that each ten villages would be obliged to build a church. He invited foreign priests to Hungary to evangelize his kingdom. Saint Astricus served as his adviser and Saint Gerard Sagredo as the tutor for his son Emeric (also rendered as Imre).
Around 1003, Stephen invaded and occupied Transylvania, a territory ruled by his maternal uncle, Gyula, a semi-independent chieftain. After this victory, Stephen organized the Diocese of Transylvania. In the next few years he also occupied the lands of the Black Magyars in the southern part of Transdanubia, and there organized the Diocese of Pécs. Shortly afterwards, it is believed that he made an agreement with Samuel Aba, the chieftain of the Kabar tribes settled in the Mátra region, who married Stephen's sister. In his brother-in-law's domains, Stephen founded the Diocese of Eger.
Finally, Stephen occupied the domains of Ajtony, a semi-pagan chieftain who had been ruling over the territories of the later Banat. Here Stephen set up the Diocese of Csanád.

[edit] External politics

A statue of the king in Miskolc
In his external politics Stephen I allied himself with his brother-in-law, the Emperor Henry II against Prince Boleslaw I of Poland, who had extended his rule over the territories between the Morava and Váh Rivers.[citation needed] Stephen sent troops to the emperor's army, and in the Peace of Bautzen, in 1018, the Polish prince had to hand over the occupied territories to Stephen.
Shortly afterwards, Stephen sent troops to help Boleslaw I in his campaign against Kievan Rus'. In 1018, Stephen lead his armies against Bulgaria, in alliance with the Byzantine Emperor Basil II, and collected several relics during his campaign.
After the death of Henry II ( 3 July 1024), Stephen broke with the German alliance, because the new Holy Roman Emperor, Conrad II claimed supremacy over the Kingdom of Hungary, while Stephen demanded the Duchy of Bavaria for his son Emeric who was the nearest relative of the deceased Emperor Henry II (who himself had been the last male descendant of the old dukes of Bavaria). In 1027, Stephen had Bishop Werner of Strasbourg, the envoy sent by Conrad II to the Byzantine Empire, arrested at the frontier. In 1030, the emperor lead his armies against Hungary, but Stephen's troops forced them to retreat. Stephen and Emperor Conrad II concluded peace negotiations in 1031, and the territories between the Leitha (Hungarian: (Lajta)) and Fischa Rivers were ceded to Hungary.

[edit] His last years

Stephen intended to retire to a life of holy contemplation and hand the kingdom over to his son Emeric, but Emeric was wounded in a hunting accident and died in 1031. In Stephen's words of mourning:
By God's secret decision death took him, so that wickedness would not change his soul and false imaginations would not deceive his mind – as the Book of Wisdom teaches about early death.
Stephen mourned for a very long time over the loss of his son, which took a great toll on his health. He eventually recovered, but never regained his original vitality. Having no children left, he could not find anyone among his remaining relatives who was able to rule the country competently and be willing to maintain the Christian faith of the nation. He did not want to entrust his kingdom to his cousin, Duke Vazul, whom he suspected to be following pagan customs. The disregarded duke took part in a conspiracy aimed at the murder of Stephen I, but the assassination attempt failed and Vazul had his eyes gouged out and molten lead poured in his ears. Without a living heir, on his deathbed, King St. Istvan (pronounced EESHT-vahn) raised with his right hand the Holy Crown of Hungary, (given to him by the pope because he had civilized the pagan Hungarians by the tenets and sacraments of the Holy Catholic Faith), and prayed to the Blessed Virgin Mary, asking her to take the Hungarian people as her subjects and become their queen. As though it were the first of many signs that she did accept this offer and position, King Stephen died on the feast day which commemorates the bodily assumption into heaven of the Blessed Virgin Mary, from where she continues to act with motherly mercy for the well-being of mankind, the Feast of the Assumption on 15 August, in the year 1038, at Esztergom-Szentkirály or Székesfehérvár, where he was buried. His nobles and his subjects were said to have mourned for three straight years afterwards.[citation needed]

[edit] His legacy

Following Stephen's death, his nephew Peter Urseolo (his appointed heir) and his brother-in-law Samuel Aba contended for the crown. Nine years of instability followed until Stephen's cousin Andrew I was crowned King of Hungary in 1047 to re-establish the Árpád dynasty. Hungarian historiography saw Peter and Samuel as members of the Árpád dynasty, and both are counted among the Árpád kings.
The Holy Right, the king's right hand
Shortly after Stephen's death, healing miracles were said to have occurred at his tomb. Stephen was canonized by Pope Gregory VII as Saint Stephen of Hungary in 1083, along with his son, Saint Emeric and Bishop Gerhard (Hungarian: Szent Gellért). Thus Saint Stephen became the first canonized confessor king, a new category of saint. He is venerated as the patron saint of Hungary, kings, children who are dying, masons, stonecutters, and bricklayers.
St Stephen is not mentioned in the Tridentine Calendar. His feast day was added to the General Roman Calendar only in 1631, and only as a commemoration on 20 August, the feast of Saint Bernard of Clairvaux. In 1687, it was moved to 2 September and remained there until the 1969 revision of the Roman Catholic calendar of saints. Then the feast of Saint Joachim on 16 August was moved and the date became available for another celebration, so the feast of Saint Stephen of Hungary was moved to that date, the day immediately after his death.[20] Some traditionalist Catholics continue to observe pre-1970 versions of the General Roman Calendar.
In the local calendar of the Church in Hungary, the feast is observed on 20 August, the day on which his sacred relics were translated to the city of Buda. It is a public holiday in Hungary.
The king's right hand, known as the Holy Right, is kept as a relic. Hungarians interpreted the incorruptibility of his right arm and hand - with which he had held the Holy Crown aloft from his deathbed when asking our Lady to be the Queen of the Hungarians - as a sign that the Blessed Virgin Mary had accepted the king's offer to her of the Hungarian people, and she remains officially their queen. The incorrupt arm was divided among European royalty, but the Holy Right of King Saint Stephen was placed in a town built solely for the purpose of keeping it, the town in Transylvania called "Szent Jobb", or Holy Right. Later, the Holy Right was transferred to where it is today, the Basilica of King Saint Stephen in Budapest. Apart from the Holy Right, only some bone fragments remain, which are kept in churches throughout Hungary. Hungarian Catholics honor the first king of their country with annual processions, at which the Holy Right is exhibited.
The canonization of Saint Stephen was recognized by Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople in the year 2000.[10]
The Holy Crown, popularly attributed to St. Stephen, was removed from the country in 1945 for safekeeping, and entrusted to the United States government. It was kept in a vault at Fort Knox until 1978, when it was returned to the nation by order of President Jimmy Carter. It has been enshrined in the Hungarian parliament building in Budapest since 2000.

[edit] Quote

A miniature of the king from the Chronicon Pictum, 1360.
" My dearest son, if you desire to honor the royal crown, I advise, I counsel, I urge you above all things to maintain the Catholic and Apostolic faith with such diligence and care that you may be an example for all those placed under you by God, and that all the clergy may rightly call you a man of true Christian profession. Failing to do this, you may be sure that you will not be called a Christian or a son of the Church. Indeed, in the royal palace, after the faith itself, the Church holds second place, first constituted and spread through the whole world by His members, the apostles and holy fathers, And though she always produced fresh offspring, nevertheless in certain places she is regarded as ancient. However, dearest son, even now in our kingdom the Church is proclaimed as young and newly planted; and for that reason she needs more prudent and trustworthy guardians less a benefit which the divine mercy bestowed on us undeservedly should be destroyed and annihilated through your idleness, indolence or neglect. My beloved son, delight of my heart, hope of your posterity, I pray, I command, that at very time and in everything, strengthened by your devotion to me, you may show favor not only to relations and kin, or to the most eminent, be they leaders or rich men or neighbors or fellow-countrymen, but also to foreigners and to all who come to you. By fulfilling your duty in this way you will reach the highest state of happiness. Be merciful to all who are suffering violence, keeping always in your heart the example of the Lord who said: "I desire mercy and not sacrifice". Be patient with everyone, not only with the powerful, but also with the weak.
Finally be strong lest prosperity lift you up too much or adversity cast you down. Be humble in this life that God may raise you up in the next. Be truly moderate and do not punish or condemn anyone immoderately. Be gentle so that you may never oppose justice. Be honorable so that you never voluntarily bring disgrace upon anyone. Be chaste so that you may avoid all the foulness that so resembles the pangs of death.
All these virtues I have noted above make up the royal crown and without them no one is fit to rule here on earth or attain to the heavenly Kingdom..
"
–Excerpt from Saint Stephen's admonitions to his son Emeric.

[edit] Artistic representation

King Stephen of Hungary has been a popular theme in art, especially from the 19th century on, with the development of nationalism. Paintings such as The Baptism of Vajk (1875) by Gyula Benczúr and many statues representing the king all over Hungary testify to Stephen's importance in Hungarian national thought.
The last complete opera by the Hungarian composer Ferenc Erkel is István király (King Stephen) (1885). The best known representations of St. Stephen in music are Ludwig van Beethoven's King Stephen Overture, and the 1983 rock opera István, a király (Stephen, the King) by Levente Szörényi and János Bródy. Szörényi's Veled, Uram! (With You, my Lord!) (2000) was a sequel to István király.
The crown is represented in the painting of Edward Burne-Jones, started in 1881, The Last Sleep of Arthur in Avalon.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ István halála
  2. ^ Esztergom.hu
  3. ^ Hankó Ildikó: Királyaink Tömegsírban
  4. ^ a b c d e "Stephen I". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.. 2008. http://britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/565415/Stephen-I. Retrieved 2008-07-29. 
  5. ^ He was referred to as Waic by Thietmar of Merseburg. "Vajk" is probably a turkic name meaning "rich" or "hero", but it may have originated from the Hungarian word for butter ("vaj"), as well.
  6. ^ a b History of Latin Christianity. Michigan State University. pp. 398. ISBN 9781144985040. http://books.google.com/books?id=6iqEkINoXdgC&printsec=titlepage&hl=hu#PPA398,M1. Retrieved 2008-07-29. 
  7. ^ Some Polish sources claim his mother was the Polish princess Adelajda from the dynasty of the Piasts, the second wife of Géza, after Sarolt's death, but this version is generally rejected by historians,
  8. ^ For, Society (1842). The Penny Cyclopædia of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful. C. Knight. p. 29. http://books.google.com/books?id=qlYMAAAAYAAJ&printsec=titlepage&hl=hu#PPA29,M1. Retrieved 2008-07-31. 
  9. ^ "Foundation for Medieval Genealogy". http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/HUNGARY.htm#_ftnref230. Retrieved 2008-07-29. 
  10. ^ a b "Országalapító királyunk és a keleti hagyományok kapcsolatáról" (in Hungarian). Új Ember (Catholic weekly). 2005-08-21. http://ujember.katolikus.hu/Archivum/2005.08.21/0201.html. Retrieved 2008-07-30. 
  11. ^ Engel, Pal; Andrew Ayton (2005). The Realm of St Stephen: A History of Medieval Hungary. I.B.Tauris. pp. 27. ISBN 185043977X. http://books.google.hu/books?id=vEJNBqanT_8C&printsec=frontcover#PPA27,M1. 
  12. ^ "St. Stephen". Catholic Encyclopedia. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14287a.htm. Retrieved 2008-07-30. 
  13. ^ "Legenda maior Sancti Regis Stephani" ("The major legend of King Saint Stephen")
  14. ^ The name "Stephen" derives from the Greek στεφανος, "stephanos," meaning "crowned."
  15. ^ According to Legenda Aurea by Jacobus Voragine
  16. ^ a b Legenda maior Sancti Regis Stephani (The major legend of King Saint Stephen)
  17. ^ Hermann of Reichenau: Chronicon de sex ætatibus mundi (Chronicle of the six ages of the world)
  18. ^ a b Chronicon Pictum
  19. ^ Some authors call them Poznan and Hunt claiming that Poznan was a Slovakian landholder in the Nitra region, but the sources seem to strengthen the idea that the brothers arrived in Hungary in the company of Giselle.
  20. ^ "Calendarium Romanum" (Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1969), pp. 100, 137

[edit] External links

                        


God bless you!


Mother Eliora, 
M.S. OHR


                    
        ORDER OF THE HOLY ROSE,
A Catholic order in the Angl.-Catholic tradition 
in affiliation with Bishop Ralph Napierski in union
with the RCC


Monday, 26 July 2010

FW: [Order of the Holy Rose] Memorial of St Joachim and St Anne


with the RCC





From: mothersuperiorohr@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:54:01 +0100
Subject: [Order of the Holy Rose] Memorial of St Joachim and St Anne
To: orderoftheholyrose@yahoogroups.com; order-of-the-holy-rose@googlegroups.com

July 26, 2010
Memorial of Saint Joachim and Saint Anne,
parents of the Blessed Virgin Mary


Reading 1

Jer 13:1-11
The LORD said to me: Go buy yourself a linen loincloth;
wear it on your loins, but do not put it in water.
I bought the loincloth, as the LORD commanded, and put it on.
A second time the word of the LORD came to me thus:
Take the loincloth which you bought and are wearing,
and go now to the Parath;
there hide it in a cleft of the rock.
Obedient to the LORD's command, I went to the Parath
and buried the loincloth.
After a long interval, the LORD said to me:
Go now to the Parath and fetch the loincloth
which I told you to hide there.
Again I went to the Parath, sought out and took the loincloth
from the place where I had hid it.
But it was rotted, good for nothing!
Then the message came to me from the LORD:
Thus says the LORD:
So also I will allow the pride of Judah to rot,
the great pride of Jerusalem.
This wicked people who refuse to obey my words,
who walk in the stubbornness of their hearts,
and follow strange gods to serve and adore them,
shall be like this loincloth which is good for nothing.
For, as close as the loincloth clings to a man's loins,
so had I made the whole house of Israel
and the whole house of Judah cling to me, says the LORD;
to be my people, my renown, my praise, my beauty.
But they did not listen.
Responsorial Psalm
R. (see 18a) You have forgotten God who gave you birth.
You were unmindful of the Rock that begot you,
You forgot the God who gave you birth.
When the LORD saw this, he was filled with loathing
and anger toward his sons and daughters.
R. You have forgotten God who gave you birth.
"I will hide my face from them," he said,
"and see what will then become of them.
What a fickle race they are,
sons with no loyalty in them!"
R. You have forgotten God who gave you birth.
"Since they have provoked me with their 'no-god'
and angered me with their vain idols,
I will provoke them with a 'no-people';
with a foolish nation I will anger them."
R. You have forgotten God who gave you birth.
Gospel
Jesus proposed a parable to the crowds.
"The Kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed
that a person took and sowed in a field.
It is the smallest of all the seeds,
yet when full-grown it is the largest of plants.
It becomes a large bush,
and the 'birds of the sky come and dwell in its branches.'"
He spoke to them another parable.
"The Kingdom of heaven is like yeast
that a woman took and mixed with three measures of wheat flour
until the whole batch was leavened."
All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds in parables.
He spoke to them only in parables,
to fulfill what had been said through the prophet:
I will open my mouth in parables,
I will announce what has lain hidden from the foundation
of the world.

Feast of St James



From: mothersuperiorohr@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:57:07 +0100
Subject: [Order of the Holy Rose] Feast of St James
To: orderoftheholyrose@yahoogroups.com; order-of-the-holy-rose@googlegroups.com

Ordinary Time: July 25th Next Day

Facebook Twitter Feast of St. James, apostle Old Calendar: St. James, apostle; St. Christopher

St. James, known as the Greater, in order to distinguish him from the other Apostle St. James, our Lord's cousin, was St. John's brother. With Peter and John he was one of the witnesses of the Transfiguration, as later he was also of the agony in the garden. He was beheaded in Jerusalem in 42 or 43 on the orders of Herod Agrippa. Since the ninth century Spain has claimed the honour of possessing his relics, though it must be said that actual proof is far less in evidence than the devotion of the faithful. The pilgrimage to St. James of Compostella in the Middle Ages attracted immense crowds; after the pilgrimage to Rome or the Holy Land, it was the most famous and the most frequented pilgrimage in Christendom. The pilgrim paths to Compostella form a network over Europe; they are dotted with pilgrims' hospices and chapels, some of which still exist. St. James is mentioned in the Roman Canon of the Mass.
According to the 1962 Missal of Bl. John XXIII the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite, today is also the feast of St. Christopher who suffered martyrdom in Asia Minor about the year 250. The devotion of our fathers, taking its due from his name (Christopher means bearer of Christ), caused them to place colossal statues of the saint bearing the infant Christ on his shoulders at the entrance to cathedrals. Thus arose the legend of the giant who carried the child Jesus over a river... and the devotion to St. Christopher as the patron of motorists and all forms of transport. He is one of the Fourteen Holy Helpers.

St. James
In Spain, he is called El Senor Santiago, the patron saint of horsemen and soldiers, and his great shrine at Santiago de Compostela in that country has been a place of pilgrimage for centuries. He is one of those that Jesus called Boanerges, "son of thunder," the brother of John the Evangelist and the son of Zebedee the fisherman from Galilee.St. James the Greater and his brother John were apparently partners with those other two brothers, Peter and Andrew, and lived in Bethsaida, on the north shore of the Sea of Galilee. How and where James first met Jesus, we do not know; but there is an old legend that makes Salome, his mother, a sister of Mary, and if this were the case, he would have known Jesus from childhood.
Along with Peter and his brother John, James was part of the inner circle of Jesus, who witnessed the Transfiguration, were witnesses to certain of His miracles, like the raising of the daughter of Jairus, and accompanied Him to the Garden of Gethsemani. Like his brother, he was active in the work of evangelization after the death of Jesus, and one legend, very unlikely, even has him going to Spain after Jesus' resurrection.
His prominence and his presence in Jerusalem must have been well known, for scarcely a dozen years after the Resurrection, he became involved in the political maneuverings of the day and was arrested and executed by King Herod Agrippa. This was followed by the arrest of Peter also, so his death must have been part of a purge of Christian leaders by Agrippa, who saw the new Christian movement as a threat to Judaism.
Jesus had foretold this kind of fate when He prophesied that James and his brother John would "drink of the same chalice" of suffering as Himself. The two brothers had asked to be seated at the right of Jesus and at His left in His kingdom, and Jesus told them that they would be with Him in a far different way than they expected.
James's death is the only biblical record we have of the death of one of the Apostles, and he was the first of that chosen band to give his life for his Master.
Excerpted from The One Year Book of Saints by Rev. Clifford Stevens.
Patron: Against arthritis; against rheumatism; Antigua, Guatemala; apothecaries; blacksmiths; Chile; Compostela, Spain; druggists; equestrians; furriers; Galicia, Spain; Guatemala; horsemen; knights; laborers; Medjugorje, Bosnia-Herzegovina; Nicaragua; pharmacists; pilgrims; Pistoia, Italy; rheumatoid sufferers; riders; soldiers; Spain; Spanish conquistadors; tanners; veterinarians.
Symbols: Cockle shell; dark-bearded man holding a book; dark-bearded man holding a scroll; dark-bearded man holding a sword; dark-bearded man with a floppy pilgrim's hat, long staff, water bottle, and scallop shell; elderly, bearded man wearing a hat with a scallop shell; key; man with shells around him; mounted on horseback, trampling a Moor; pilgrim with wallet and staff; pilgrim's hat; pilgrim's staff; scallop shell; sword.

Thursday, 22 July 2010

Prayer



                        





From: mothersuperiorohr@googlemail.com
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:19:36 +0100
Subject: [Order of the Holy Rose] Prayer
To: orderoftheholyrose@yahoogroups.com; order-of-the-holy-rose@googlegroups.com; benedictxvi@vatican.va; bischof_ralph@jesus-liebt-dich.info

Jesus says: 'I am the way, the truth and the life'. And thus we repent our every sin against our next of kin every day anew with faith, hope and trust that in unity will finally ring His one holy Catholic and apostolic church bell renewed and purified with the holy truth as its melody for eternity. Have a blessed Day and thank you to all priests for your prayers that you offer on behalf of your flock on Mary Magdalene's day to her beloved Jesus.

St Mary Magdalene


Mary Magdalene went and announced to the disciples,
"I have seen the Lord,"
and then reported what he told her.

AND MARY MAGDALENE'S MESSAGE TO US TO THIS VERY DAY IS VERY CLEAR: JESUS CHRIST IS ALWAYS NEAR AND ONLY HIS IS THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE. ONLY HE WAS FREE OF SIN AND SO, WE MUST REPENT EVEN THE SLIGHTEST FAILING AGAINST OUR NEXT OF KIN AND SHARE EACH OTHER'S BURDEN IN LOVING-KINDNESS EVERY DAY ANEW - IN OUR KITCHEN HEARTH AND IN THE CHURCH PEW. THE HOLY TRUTH OF JESUS AND MARY MAGDALENE HAS COME TO LIFE, AND OVER IS THE RULE OF THOSE, WHO BETRAYED JESUS CHRIST, GOD'S BELOVED HOLY ROSE, BUD AND BLOSSOM, AND HIS BELOVED ONE AND ONLY WIFE, MARY MAGDALA. BOTH ARE ESPOUSED WITH EACH OTHER AND TO CHRIST'S CHURCH AS ONE THROUGH GOD ALONE, AND THAT FACT ALWAYS STAYED IN HEAVEN INTACT AS THEY COULD NEVER BE PARTED BY THOSE OF MANY A SECRET SOCIETY, WHO HAVE STABBED THEM IN EVERY INCARNATION REPEATEDLY IN THE BACK WITH A RITUAL KNIFE WITH ON THEIR HEAD AN EGYPTIAN CONE. JESUS LOVES ALL HIS FAITHFUL DISCIPLES AND ESPECIALLY WITH MARY MAGDALENE ALSO THEIR EVERY ENEMY AND I PRAY THAT THEY ALL LOOSE IN THE END THEIR JEALOUSY AND ENVY AND RATHER SUPPORT JESUS AS THE HOLY FATHER AND MARY MAGDALA AS THE MOTHER OF THEIR CHILDREN JACOB AND ZARA-ZARAI AS SADLY THEY WERE NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO EXIST NEITHER IN HIS BELOVED CHURCH NOR THROUGH THOSE, WHO WOULD RATHER TRY TO LOCK UP THEIR SECRETS IN A SERAIL. AND COMPLETE WOULD BE FINALLY PEACEFULLY IN UNITY THE ONE HOLY FAMILY OF ABRAHAM AND SARAH FOR ETERNITY.
                        


God bless you!


Mother Eliora, 
M.S. OHR


                    
        ORDER OF THE HOLY ROSE,
A Catholic order in the Angl.-Catholic tradition 
in affiliation with Bishop Ralph Napierski in union
with the RCC


Wednesday, 21 July 2010

A Word after the Synod

We pray and continue to live the holy truth and dwell in the living word incarnated through Christ in His Angl.-Catholic church tradition, wherever we are. And we give thanks for all deacons, priests and bishops, who are staying faithful to the one holy Catholic and Apostolic church in whatever way the Holy Spirit guides them towards to lead by example in their vocation. We pray that all discern their calling regardless of worldly concerns as we are called to stand up for the Holy Eucharist and to leave the world behind as God provides for all our needs, and if we share freely, what we are being given freely, all will be well but tumbling down will be the sandcastles of man-made hell; and Christ has anyway His own consecrated church bell that will always the holy truth from the beginning of time tell, including the Book of Ruth.

We only have to trust in Him and follow Jesus in His footsteps and we will arrive safely back home, where we all belong, be it in a church with or occasionally under the blue sky as our dome - in God's house administered by priests of the true apostolic succession free of corruption and man- (and female-)made amendments - in voluntary blessed celibacy, holy matrimony or within a holy God-given community without hypocrisy and free of blasphemy but faithful to God's complete living holy family - as the holy truth has come to life through Jesus in His eternal living word that is no longer subject to any kind of secret society ritual knife. Jesus Christ - His is the way, the truth and eternal life!

We have been here before over and again in the true church of Jesus Christ, and so His disciples will simply gather at the right shore, as out is finally of the renewed and purified church with her lame game the babylonian whore in her disguise of the golden calf and cow, only that she does not know it yet, as she does not even believe in the power of the mustard seed sower, who is the Son of God beget - so, as far as we are concerned over in our midst is her tacky and pompous show with her artificially and piratery jewel encrusted glow.

We simply will in utmost obedience and humility in the Angl.-Catholic tradition serve God and with Jesus straight to God's Holy Rose garden our mustards seeds sow.

God bless you!

Mother Eliora



                       


God bless you!


Mother Eliora, 
M.S. OHR


                    
        ORDER OF THE HOLY ROSE,
A Catholic order in the Angl.-Catholic tradition 
in affiliation with Bishop Ralph Napierski in union
with the RCC


July 22nd MMX: Memorial of St Mary Magdalene



July 22, 2010
Memorial of Saint Mary Magdalene


Reading 1

Jer 2:1-3, 7-8, 12-13
This word of the LORD came to me:
Go, cry out this message for Jerusalem to hear!
I remember the devotion of your youth,
how you loved me as a bride,
Following me in the desert,
in a land unsown.
Sacred to the LORD was Israel,
the first fruits of his harvest;
Should any presume to partake of them,
evil would befall them, says the LORD.
When I brought you into the garden land
to eat its goodly fruits,
You entered and defiled my land,
you made my heritage loathsome.
The priests asked not,
"Where is the LORD?"
Those who dealt with the law knew me not:
the shepherds rebelled against me.
The prophets prophesied by Baal,
and went after useless idols.
Be amazed at this, O heavens,
and shudder with sheer horror, says the LORD.
Two evils have my people done:
they have forsaken me, the source of living waters;
They have dug themselves cisterns,
broken cisterns, that hold no water.
Responsorial Psalm
R. (10a) With you is the fountain of life, O Lord.
O LORD, your mercy reaches to heaven;
your faithfulness, to the clouds.
Your justice is like the mountains of God;
your judgments, like the mighty deep.
R. With you is the fountain of life, O Lord.
How precious is your mercy, O God!
The children of men take refuge in the shadow of your wings.
They have their fill of the prime gifts of your house;
from your delightful stream you give them to drink.
R. With you is the fountain of life, O Lord.
For with you is the fountain of life,
and in your light we see light.
Keep up your mercy toward your friends,
your just defense of the upright of heart.
R. With you is the fountain of life, O Lord.
On the first day of the week,
Mary Magdalene came to the tomb early in the morning,
while it was still dark,
and saw the stone removed from the tomb.
So she ran and went to Simon Peter
and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and told them,
"They have taken the Lord from the tomb,
and we don't know where they put him."
Mary stayed outside the tomb weeping.
And as she wept, she bent over into the tomb
and saw two angels in white sitting there,
one at the head and one at the feet
where the Body of Jesus had been.
And they said to her, "Woman, why are you weeping?"
She said to them, "They have taken my Lord,
and I don't know where they laid him."
When she had said this, she turned around and saw Jesus there,
but did not know it was Jesus.
Jesus said to her, "Woman, why are you weeping?
Whom are you looking for?"
She thought it was the gardener and said to him,
"Sir, if you carried him away,
tell me where you laid him,
and I will take him."
Jesus said to her, "Mary!"
She turned and said to him in Hebrew,
"Rabbouni," which means Teacher.
Jesus said to her,
"Stop holding on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father.
But go to my brothers and tell them,
'I am going to my Father and your Father,
to my God and your God.'"
Mary Magdalene went and announced to the disciples,
"I have seen the Lord,"
and then reported what he told her.

Thursday, 15 July 2010

P.S.: From the Bishop of London - General Synod - What actually happened...







From: mothersuperiorohr@googlemail.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:16:51 +0100
Subject: P.S.: From the Bishop of London - General Synod - What act...



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mother Superior <mothersuperiorohr@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Subject: P.S.: From the Bishop of London - General Synod - What act...
To: bischof_ralph@jesus-liebt-dich.info


P.S.: And I might add that a female bishop, who demonstratively dresses up for tea parties in palaces and with her mitre under her arm in cathedrals and so demonstratively dresses up with jewellery instead of sharing the value of her amethysts and emeralds with the poor and needy is obviously for more - maybe the post of an archbishop?!  That would make the blasphemy of Christ's sacrament complete, and will definitely seal the new era sect of the Anti-Christ, as the worshippers of this sect might sell this idea as a church but the one Catholic and apostolic church it is certainly not.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mother Eliora <MotherSuperiorOHR@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Subject: [Order of the Holy Rose] From the Bishop of London - General Synod - What act...
To: mothersuperiorohr@googlemail.com




                        








From: mothersuperiorohr@googlemail.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:17:38 +0100
Subject: [Order of the Holy Rose] From the Bishop of London - General Synod - What actually happened?
To: orderoftheholyrose@yahoogroups.com; order-of-the-holy-rose@googlegroups.com; communications@london.anglican.org

I only say this: God knows that I cried my heart out for His beloved one holy Catholic and apostolic church in the Anglo-Catholic church and for the souls, who betray it purposefully, and have failed to defend the Holy Eucharist in the Church of England as from the moment the first female priest was ordained it was already compromised and from the moment the first female bishop will be consecrated it is no longer the church of Christ but of the Anti-Christ, and those, who have a part in this, know exactly, what they are doing.
I pray that I have done all with the gifts He entrusted to me to defend and stand up for His Most Blessed Sacrament, as I feel the thorns piercing through me at the very thought of the souls, who commit this act of blasphemy and make no mistake,
blasphemy and mockery of Christ's last commandment it is. I nonetheless pray especially for those souls that they may still see God's Infinite Light and return to Christ as only Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. I share in His burden and I share in the burden of those, who live the way of Christ and carry His cross with Him and I love Him over the brim.

May God accept my tears as my silent prayer.

Blessed be God.
Blessed be the Jesus Christ, God's beloved Holy Rose, bud and blossom.
Blessed be His Most Sacred Heart.
Blessed be His Most Precious Blood.
Blessed be Jesus in the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar.
Blessed be His living Word.
Blessed be His Holy Truth.
Blessed be His Holy Family.

God bless you!

Mother Eliora
Mother Superior OHR
Order of the Holy Rose




From: communications@london.anglican.org [mailto:communications@london.anglican.org]
Sent: 13 July 2010 13:57
Subject: From the Bishop of London - General Synod - What actually happened?

cid:image005.png@01CAE2FC.6931AE60

From the Bishop of London

13th July 2010

General Synod – What actually happened?

Dear Friends,
                         
Most of us get information about what is happening in the rest of the church beyond our own patch from the mass media. Understandably in a fierce ratings war and in the struggle to get religious news of any kind reported there is tendency to hype and dramatise and to give undue prominence to extreme voices.

Almost every week we are told that that the Church of England faces "the greatest crisis since the reformation" and "that a split is imminent".

Actually the weather at the 2010 General Synod in York was much more temperate than in July 2009.   I was very proud of the way in which your representatives from the London Diocese, speaking from different viewpoints, made a constructive contribution to many of the debates.   The Bishop of Willesden in particular with his characteristic candour shone a bright light on the complex business before us.

The outcome is that the measure to permit women to be consecrated to the episcopate has been remitted for consideration in the Dioceses.   This process will take about eighteen months before the matter returns to the General Synod.

There is no doubt that a substantial majority in the Synod and in the Church is strongly in favour of this change and for many, the Synod's decision will be a cause for heartfelt rejoicing.   It was also significant that only a very few of those opposed to this measure sought to delay the process.   There is a general feeling that it is urgent to conclude a debate which can appear somewhat introverted when our real focus must be on our unity in mission and in service to a country facing turbulent times.

In consequence much of the discussion was about how to secure an honoured place for those who cannot accept such a decision as one authorised by scripture and tradition and who believe that it will erect new obstacles in our relations with other parts of the "one, holy catholic and apostolic church" to which we claim to belong.

It is emphatically not true to say that the measure as it stands contains no provisions for those who hold such a view. Attempts during the two days of debate to amend the draft measure to remove any arrangements to assist those who adhere to the present practice of the Church were decisively rebuffed.

The draft as it stands offers a "statutory code of practice" to protect the position of those opposed to this development.  The question which occupied much of our time was – "Is it enough?"

There was clearly an anxiety in some parts of the Synod that given the sense among a number of supporters of the proposal to ordain women as bishops that this was a gospel and justice matter, "a code of practice" would not be strong enough to ensure respect for the minority who on theological and biblical grounds continued to resist the change. 

It is a complex question particularly given the fact that the contents of such a code have not been worked out.   At the same time a number of words which have been used in the debate thus far, such as "delegation" and "transfer" have become freighted with negative connotations.

The Archbishops attempted to clear a way through the impasse by introducing the concept of "co-ordinate jurisdiction". The contents of such a "co-ordinariate" would also have to be settled by reference to the, as yet undrafted, code of practice.   Although I voted for the amendment, it is unsurprising that there was a good deal of confusion about what such a concept might mean in practice.   The Archbishops' proposal failed to secure a majority in the House of Clergy although it passed the Bishops and the Laity.

The important point is that valiant attempts are being made to open the way for women to be consecrated bishops without excluding from the church those who adhere to the present position and who share the faith which inspires our mission.

We now have an opportunity to consider the draft legislation in the Diocese and I shall be setting out the process for doing this in due course.   At the same time the House of Bishops is charged with working on the vital question of the Code of Practice.   The Bishop of Willesden and I will be fully involved in these discussions.

There will be a special meeting of the Diocesan Synod to ponder and vote on the advice which London will be sending back to the General Synod.

I do hope that anyone questioning their place in the Church of England on the basis of media reports or premature judgements about the final shape of the legislation will get in touch with me or with their respective Area Bishop before making any personal decisions or public statements.

I returned from York clear both that the majority will is to ordain women bishops while at the same time preserving, as far as possible, the unity of the church in her mission and service to our country. 


With thanks for our partnership in the Gospel.


The Rt Revd and Rt Hon Richard Chartres KCVO DD FSA



--
Posted By Mother Eliora to Order of the Holy Rose on 7/14/2010 01:24:00 PM


Wednesday, 14 July 2010

From the Bishop of London - General Synod - What actually happened?



                        









From: mothersuperiorohr@googlemail.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:17:38 +0100
Subject: [Order of the Holy Rose] From the Bishop of London - General Synod - What actually happened?
To: orderoftheholyrose@yahoogroups.com; order-of-the-holy-rose@googlegroups.com; communications@london.anglican.org

I only say this: God knows that I cried my heart out for His beloved one holy Catholic and apostolic church in the Anglo-Catholic church and for the souls, who betray it purposefully, and have failed to defend the Holy Eucharist in the Church of England as from the moment the first female priest was ordained it was already compromised and from the moment the first female bishop will be consecrated it is no longer the church of Christ but of the Anti-Christ, and those, who have a part in this, know exactly, what they are doing.
I pray that I have done all with the gifts He entrusted to me to defend and stand up for His Most Blessed Sacrament, as I feel the thorns piercing through me at the very thought of the souls, who commit this act of blasphemy and make no mistake,
blasphemy and mockery of Christ's last commandment it is. I nonetheless pray especially for those souls that they may still see God's Infinite Light and return to Christ as only Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. I share in His burden and I share in the burden of those, who live the way of Christ and carry His cross with Him and I love Him over the brim.

May God accept my tears as my silent prayer.

Blessed be God.
Blessed be the Jesus Christ, God's beloved Holy Rose, bud and blossom.
Blessed be His Most Sacred Heart.
Blessed be His Most Precious Blood.
Blessed be Jesus in the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar.
Blessed be His living Word.
Blessed be His Holy Truth.
Blessed be His Holy Family.

God bless you!

Mother Eliora
Mother Superior OHR
Order of the Holy Rose


 

 

From: communications@london.anglican.org [mailto:communications@london.anglican.org]
Sent: 13 July 2010 13:57
Subject: From the Bishop of London - General Synod - What actually happened?

 

cid:image005.png@01CAE2FC.6931AE60

 

From the Bishop of London

 

13th July 2010

 

General Synod – What actually happened?

 

Dear Friends,

                         

Most of us get information about what is happening in the rest of the church beyond our own patch from the mass media. Understandably in a fierce ratings war and in the struggle to get religious news of any kind reported there is tendency to hype and dramatise and to give undue prominence to extreme voices.

 

Almost every week we are told that that the Church of England faces "the greatest crisis since the reformation" and "that a split is imminent".

 

Actually the weather at the 2010 General Synod in York was much more temperate than in July 2009.   I was very proud of the way in which your representatives from the London Diocese, speaking from different viewpoints, made a constructive contribution to many of the debates.   The Bishop of Willesden in particular with his characteristic candour shone a bright light on the complex business before us.

 

The outcome is that the measure to permit women to be consecrated to the episcopate has been remitted for consideration in the Dioceses.   This process will take about eighteen months before the matter returns to the General Synod.

 

There is no doubt that a substantial majority in the Synod and in the Church is strongly in favour of this change and for many, the Synod's decision will be a cause for heartfelt rejoicing.   It was also significant that only a very few of those opposed to this measure sought to delay the process.   There is a general feeling that it is urgent to conclude a debate which can appear somewhat introverted when our real focus must be on our unity in mission and in service to a country facing turbulent times.

 

In consequence much of the discussion was about how to secure an honoured place for those who cannot accept such a decision as one authorised by scripture and tradition and who believe that it will erect new obstacles in our relations with other parts of the "one, holy catholic and apostolic church" to which we claim to belong.

 

It is emphatically not true to say that the measure as it stands contains no provisions for those who hold such a view. Attempts during the two days of debate to amend the draft measure to remove any arrangements to assist those who adhere to the present practice of the Church were decisively rebuffed.

 

The draft as it stands offers a "statutory code of practice" to protect the position of those opposed to this development.  The question which occupied much of our time was – "Is it enough?"

 

There was clearly an anxiety in some parts of the Synod that given the sense among a number of supporters of the proposal to ordain women as bishops that this was a gospel and justice matter, "a code of practice" would not be strong enough to ensure respect for the minority who on theological and biblical grounds continued to resist the change. 

 

It is a complex question particularly given the fact that the contents of such a code have not been worked out.   At the same time a number of words which have been used in the debate thus far, such as "delegation" and "transfer" have become freighted with negative connotations.

 

The Archbishops attempted to clear a way through the impasse by introducing the concept of "co-ordinate jurisdiction". The contents of such a "co-ordinariate" would also have to be settled by reference to the, as yet undrafted, code of practice.   Although I voted for the amendment, it is unsurprising that there was a good deal of confusion about what such a concept might mean in practice.   The Archbishops' proposal failed to secure a majority in the House of Clergy although it passed the Bishops and the Laity.

 

The important point is that valiant attempts are being made to open the way for women to be consecrated bishops without excluding from the church those who adhere to the present position and who share the faith which inspires our mission.

 

We now have an opportunity to consider the draft legislation in the Diocese and I shall be setting out the process for doing this in due course.   At the same time the House of Bishops is charged with working on the vital question of the Code of Practice.   The Bishop of Willesden and I will be fully involved in these discussions.

 

There will be a special meeting of the Diocesan Synod to ponder and vote on the advice which London will be sending back to the General Synod.

 

I do hope that anyone questioning their place in the Church of England on the basis of media reports or premature judgements about the final shape of the legislation will get in touch with me or with their respective Area Bishop before making any personal decisions or public statements.

 

I returned from York clear both that the majority will is to ordain women bishops while at the same time preserving, as far as possible, the unity of the church in her mission and service to our country. 

 

 

With thanks for our partnership in the Gospel.

 

 

The Rt Revd and Rt Hon Richard Chartres KCVO DD FSA